BlogCompare14 Browser Automation Pricing for Quick Comparisons
Compare6 min read

14 Browser Automation Pricing for Quick Comparisons

Compare 14 browser automation pricing and and features for 2026 — Browser Use, Browserbase Stagehand, Browserless, Kernel, Steel, Skyvern and more. Pricing, features, open-source status side by side.

Daniel Shogbon
Daniel Shogbon
May 16, 2026
Share:

Browser automation pricing has become genuinely hard to compare in 2026. As AI agents take over web tasks — clicking, filling forms, and scraping sites that have no API — a wave of providers has emerged, and no two charge the same way.

Some bill per token. Others bill per credit, per “unit,” per gigabyte, or per browser-hour. They also sit at very different points on the open-source-to-fully-managed spectrum.

This guide breaks down browser automation pricing and features across the major players so you can compare them side by side.

Why Browser Automation Pricing Is So Hard to Compare

Browser automation pricing is hard to compare because there are two kinds of tool in this market, and conflating them is the first mistake buyers make.

The first kind is a hosted browser — the actual cloud infrastructure that runs a real Chromium instance for you. The second is an orchestration layer — an open-source CLI or framework that drives someone else’s browser.

Disparity in the Browser automation pricing units make things worse — A token, a credit, and a “unit” all mean different things, and the cheapest option depends entirely on the shape of your workload. Short bursty tasks favor unit-based plans; long sessions favor per-hour billing; proxy-heavy scraping is dominated by per-gigabyte bandwidth cost.

Browser Automation Pricing and Features: Full Comparison Table

The table below covers all 14 providers across pricing, open-source status, concurrency, stealth, and the AI agent layer.

ProviderTypePricingOpen SourceConcurrencyProxiesCAPTCHAStealth / Anti-botAI / Agent LayerProtocol / CompatibilitySelf-HostableNotable ExtrasMaturity
Rusty BrowserHosted browserFree (175 tokens/mo); $10/$50/$150 per mo; PAYG $0.05/hrYes — MITUnlimitedPremium, unlimited use includedIncluded, all users“Ghost Stealth” adaptive evasionNatural-language AI instruct engineWebDriver BiDi / CDP, direct ChromiumYes (cluster via Flux)Results storage, JS hydration, custom parsers, auto-scalingVery early (v0.1.0)
Browser UseHosted browser + agent$0/$29/$299/$999 per mo; $0.06/hrYes — open library3 → 500 by tier$5/GBIncludedAdvanced stealth“Browser Use 2.0” custom model + v3 agentBuilt on PlaywrightPartial (harness)~15× cheaper, 6× faster than frontier models; BYO-keyEstablished (1.3M+ downloads)
BrowserBase StagehandHosted browser + frameworkFree/$20/$99 per mo; ~$0.10–$0.12/hrYes — MIT (framework)3 → 250+ by tier$10–$12/GBAuto, paid tiersBasic → Advanced by tieract/extract/observe/agent primitivesDirect CDP; TS + PythonStagehand runs localAction caching, self-healing, session replay, Model GatewayEstablished
BrowserlessHosted browserFree (1k units); $25/$140/$350 per mo + EnterpriseCore closed; clients open~1 → 100 by tierResidential, 6 units/MB10 units/solveBrowserQL anti-fingerprintingSmart Scrape API, MCP server; no AI agentPuppeteer/Playwright via WebSocketYes (Enterprise)Live debugger, session replay, Lighthouse testing, hybrid automationsMature
Steel.devHosted browserFree ($10 credits, 100 hrs); $29/mo, $99/moYes — fully open sourceThousands of sessionsBuilt-in proxy chain / IP rotationBuilt-inAnti-flagging controlsFoundation only — you build agent logicPuppeteer, Playwright, Selenium, CDPYes — deploy or localPage→markdown/PDF, session viewer, extensions; 24-hr sessionsPublic beta
SkyvernHosted browser + agentFree open-source; cloud usage-based (credits)Yes — open sourceParallel instances (cloud)Bundled in cloudBundled in cloudAnti-bot in cloud versionVision-LLM + planner-actor-validator loopPlaywright-compatible SDKYes (pip / Docker)No selectors — computer vision; no-code workflow builder; templatesEstablished
HyperbrowserHosted browserFree tier; credit-based (~$0.10/hr); ~$30/mo for 30k creditsHyperAgent framework open source10,000+ concurrent browsersGlobal IP rotationAutomaticFingerprint randomization (UA, canvas, WebGL)HyperAgent (Playwright AI extension)Puppeteer, Playwright, SeleniumNo (managed)Sub-ms latency, 99.9% uptime, isolated containers, sync/async clientsNewer, fast-growing
KernelHosted browserFree tier; usage-based, no idle charges, proxies never billedYes — open sourceFleet-based (org limits)Residential, never billed separatelyAutomaticBuilt-in stealth modeAgent runtime / code execution platformPlaywright, Puppeteer, Browser Use, MagnitudeYes (open infra)Unikernel, sub-150ms cold starts, live view + replay, persistent auth, SOC 2 / HIPAA-readyNewer (YC S25, $22M raised)
Anchor BrowserHosted browserMonthly plan + usage: per-browser, per-hr, proxy/GB, per AI stepNoUnlimited concurrent browsersVPN integration, proxy supportAutomated CAPTCHA resolutionCustom session fingerprinting, anti-bot bypass“Perform web task” natural-language endpointCDP, Playwright, APIs, agent frameworksNo (cloud-hosted)Full browser isolation, Okta/Azure AD, SSO/RBAC/DPA, MCP-first; batch up to 5,000Newer
Bright Data Agent BrowserHosted browserFree (2 GB), Starter $39/mo (10 GB), PAYG $8/GB; enterprise $500–1,000+ minNo1M+ concurrent sessionsHuge residential/datacenter/mobile networkAutonomous CAPTCHA solvingHeadful GUI browser harder to detect; advanced unlocking/agent endpoint takes plain-English tasksPuppeteer, Selenium, PlaywrightNo~98% success across hard domains; MCP server; web data layerMature (enterprise)
NotteHosted browser + frameworkUsage-based (single API)Open framework (SSPL license)On-demand headless instancesStandard + customizable proxiesBundledBrowser interface for LLM agentsFull-stack web AI agents; perception layerCDP, cookie integrationYes (open framework)Secure credentials vault, session replay, websites→navigable mapsNewer
Vercel Agent BrowserOrchestration CLIFree (open source); pay only the underlying provider you connectYes — open source (vercel-labs)Depends on connected providerDepends on connected providerDepends on connected providerAI chat via Vercel AI GatewayDrives Chrome, Lightpanda, AgentCore, Browserbase, Browserless, Browser Use, KernelYes (local CLI)Snapshot refs (@e1/@e2) for LLMs, auth vault, domain allowlist, live dashboardNewer (Vercel Labs)
LightpandaBrowser engineFree; open sourceYes — open sourceLightweight local engineBring your ownBring your ownMinimal footprintNone built-inCDP-compatibleYes (local engine)Headless browser built for speed/low memory; used as an engine, not a serviceNewer
AWS Bedrock AgentCore BrowserHosted browserAWS usage-based (pay per use)NoAWS-scaleVia AWS networkingNot bundledStandardPart of Bedrock AgentCore agent runtimeCDP / PlaywrightNo (AWS-managed)Enterprise AWS integration, IAM, VPC, secure sandboxesNewer
ScrapybaraHosted desktop/browserUsage-based (credits)NoParallel instancesBundledBundledStandardComputer-use sandbox for agentsComputer Use APIs (Anthropic/OpenAI)No (managed)Full virtual desktop, not just a browser; built for computer-use agentsNewer

How to Read the Browser Automation Pricing Above

Treat the pricing column as a starting point, not a verdict.

Vercel’s Agent Browser shows “$0” because it’s an orchestration layer — it doesn’t run browsers itself, so you still pay whichever hosted provider you connect it to. Lightpanda is free for the same reason: it’s an engine, not a service.

Among the genuinely hosted browsers, the cheapest headline rate is rarely the cheapest total bill. Proxy fees, CAPTCHA charges, and idle-time billing can quietly double a quote.

You can verify any figure directly on each vendor’s own pricing page — for example Browserbase pricing, Browser Use pricing, and Browserless pricing. Underlying control protocols are documented in the Chrome DevTools Protocol reference and the W3C WebDriver BiDi spec.

Bottom Line: Which Provider to Pick

When it comes to browser automation pricing, there’s no single winner — the right pick depends on your workload.

For a full autonomous agent that plans and reasons, start with Browser Use or Stagehand. For messy legacy or canvas-heavy sites where the DOM is unreliable, Skyvern‘s vision approach earns its higher per-step cost.

For maximum control and zero lock-in, the open-source pair Steel.dev and Kernel lead — Kernel on latency, Steel on maturity. For deterministic scraping, QA, and document rendering, Browserless is a dependable veteran.

For enterprise scale, Bright Data (deepest anti-detection) or AWS AgentCore (if you’re already on AWS) are the conservative picks. Scrapybara is the odd one out — a full virtual desktop for computer-use agents, not just a browser.

Two warnings on browser automation pricing: figures change fast, so confirm them on the provider’s own page before committing. And don’t trust the marketing tables — including each vendor’s own — until you’ve run a small proof-of-concept against your real target sites.

Daniel Shogbon
Written by
Daniel Shogbon

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Leave a Comment